Pic Of Succesful Surgical Keloid Removal

WEB 2.0 y la Infoxicación

http://www.flickr.com/photos/briansolis/2735401175/sizes/l/

In recent days we were discussing the benefits of Web 2.0 as a philosophy that provides more functionality to the user to share information. It's frightening the amount of applications and tools that currently exist for sharing information and data fill the user may never go to read, or worse, that serve to dis-inform. (See picture)

While Web 2.0 reflects the behavior patterns of social networks, to create dynamic content, accelerates the production of information and provides functionality for generating content of interest to groups of practice, I come the following questions:


- How to manage the quality of content that is published?

Among the projects that have been made in knowledge management (particularly my study group), we managed to assemble tools to identify relationships and sources associated with topics of articles, sources and authors, curiously, the network is generates a very targeted group of information is often contradictory in their argument, or at the bottom being different theses have a common origin. (No particular enough?)


- How and what criteria we filter the information we found on the WWW. Apparently there are already companies that are dedicated to particular filter information on blogs, Web pages, articles, etc. and found in such "trash computer" a form of subsistence. (As they said over there - Millet, the money is there, you just have to pick out)

excess
-paralysis of analysis? an evil that comes with too much information, and is so much detail is lost north of what you want to decide what information to use and to use it. - A very common within us mastercitos - A head rest in peace (as chief) always reminded us that the best was the enemy of good, so gentlemen, better use information management approach.


- Web 2.0 on us or we Infox? Well a big question, I think is an excellent tool for managing content, however the problem is not here "arrow" but "Indian" or filter that goes wrong information. Where is the criterion for choosing the human being and especially know how to choose right? is that a lie becomes reality with the poisoning? information on the 4th power?


- What risks are we running as a society? we want to be independent and to maintain privacy but we are exposed to the public environment (Facebook, myspace, google, etc), apparently because there are very few places where we can hide. (O well .. who work in security information we usually know where to find who is hiding, and no one escapes the eyes of the Web and there is nothing, not even private banks are very safe .. hehe believe)


Some say that "perception is reality "But how dangerous this can be perceived in a society where further objectivity and where the values \u200b\u200bneed to be taken up as the cornerstone of a culture.


infoxication This idea refers to the saturation of information (with the exponential growth in exposure to information, media and the so-called Internet Information society or Infoxication) which may even to generate anxiety in the user feel not able to find the information sought.

This entire phenomenon of multiplication of the amount of information that exists in the world has come to call the 'information explosion', although it should be called the 'explosion of misinformation', indigestible and confounders.


While we are in an information society, it pays to be careful of the sources used to analyze the information professional and responsible approach and be careful about the quantity and quality of data to make decisions ( And we publish on the Web).


is not that we are infoxicando.

And you .. infoxicado is how?

Gameshark Final Fantasy Dawn Of Soul

Opensource - Una promesa sin cumplir?

The issue of Open-Source platform has been one of the most widely controversial in the field of technology, for many years. The promise of a free software platform that eliminates licensing costs, are countered by the problems access to support, upgrades and certified personnel. Leaving aside the possible political discussion on the controversial free-access software, IT managers can evaluate the Open-Source option as one that is becoming more suitable for use in managing the corporate platforms, with due consideration the limitations imposed by its use, and manage risks.

The greatest promise of open-source philosophy, in addition to significant savings, is the possibility for users to modify and customize the applications since it has full access to source code. This, though from the academic point of view may sound interesting, from the business point of view it is not so, as it requires flexible solutions to common problems: the companies do not have time to change applications from source and testing because that is not your business, and in general, people basic, have neither the time nor the knowledge to do so. Once

taken a decision to Open Source, the problem of servicing these solutions. At one extreme is a situation in which management technology continuously depends on an organized community forums, seminars and scattered resources and access-platform complex that, when they work, are available about few "geniuses" in a very unfriendly scheme for both users and managers.

Unless a technology manager considers part of its responsibility to test the solutions and taking the time to report and fix bugs in open-source platforms on, your best bet is to assess the experience in the industry, particularly if the system in question supports mission-critical processes. The risks involved in experimenting with unproven solutions in its stability and access to resources usually outweigh the advantages of open-source platform unless it has reliable evidence of its strength with clear examples and credentials success in the relevant industry.

In summary, based on Open Source solutions represent a valid and cost-efficient to the traditional scheme of licensing and operating systems. However, the benefit of the doubt (unless you want to risk a potentially lengthy and technical process of stabilization) should be against the effects of open source systems that support key processes or mission critical. The guarantee of a solid business experience and history to support their applications, or other credentials successful companies in the same industry, are necessary as support for the decision to use such systems in a company.

But think, if the problem of open source is the guarantee of support and endorsement of the industry. There is an opportunity for industry development in emerging countries? Having the community for the development of free applications would not reduce the Time 2 Market?

Now, if you usually buy the closed source companies (MS, Oracle, SAP, etc) for safety and tranquility of the managers of the organization. Because proprietary code fails because whether you pay for a good application? response time when the software failure is the business needs? owners are as stable as they say?

there I leave to think a while .. JGC as my friend who finally convinced me to start the blog.